Vulnerability · Published Apr 28, 2024 · Assigned by Linux
CVE-2022-48644net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled
Medium 5.5
In plain English
A medium-severity security flaw in Linux from Linux. There are no confirmed reports of exploitation so far. The chance it is exploited in the next 30 days is estimated at 0.2% (higher than 14% of all known vulnerabilities). Fixed versions are available - upgrade the affected package.
Official description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc->destroy() gets called even if qdisc->init() never succeeded, not exclusively since commit 87b60cfacf9f ("net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation"), but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()). The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full offload, because it starts off with q->flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in taprio_init(), then it replaces q->flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()). But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q->flags). But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() (a bitwise check of bit 1 in q->flags), it is invalid to call this macro on q->flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on an invalid set of flags. As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an error between setting q->flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the offload to be disabled when it was never enabled. The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc, but instead as child of an mqprio root qdisc: $ tc qdisc add dev swp0 root handle 1: \ mqprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 hw 0 $ tc qdisc replace dev swp0 parent 1:1 \ taprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 \ queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 base-time 0 \ sched-entry S 0x7f 990000 sched-entry S 0x80 100000 \ flags 0x0 clockid CLOCK_TAI Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffffffffff8 [fffffffffffffff8] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Call trace: taprio_dump+0x27c/0x310 vsc9959_port_setup_tc+0x1f4/0x460 felix_port_setup_tc+0x24/0x3c dsa_slave_setup_tc+0x54/0x27c taprio_disable_offload.isra.0+0x58/0xe0 taprio_destroy+0x80/0x104 qdisc_create+0x240/0x470 tc_modify_qdisc+0x1fc/0x6b0 rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12c/0x390 netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x130 rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x2c Fix this by keeping track of the operations we made, and undo the offload only if we actually did it. I've added "bool offloaded" inside a 4 byte hole between "int clockid" and "atomic64_t picos_per_byte". Now the first cache line looks like below: $ pahole -C taprio_sched net/sched/sch_taprio.o struct taprio_sched { struct Qdisc * * qdiscs; /* 0 8 */ struct Qdisc * root; /* 8 8 */ u32 flags; /* 16 4 */ enum tk_offsets tk_offset; /* 20 4 */ int clockid; /* 24 4 */ bool offloaded; /* 28 1 */ /* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */ atomic64_t picos_per_byte; /* 32 0 */ /* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */ spinlock_t current_entry_lock; /* 40 0 */ /* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */ struct sched_entry * current_entry; /* 48 8 */ struct sched_gate_list * oper_sched; /* 56 8 */ /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */
Affected packages & fixed versions
| Ecosystem | Package | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | 6.0.2-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Debian:13 | linux | 6.0.2-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Debian:14 | linux | 6.0.2-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux | 5.15.0-57.63 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-allwinner-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws | 5.15.0-1027.31 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure | 5.15.0-1030.37 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde | 5.15.0-1030.37.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp | 5.15.0-1026.33 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gke | 5.15.0-1024.29 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gkeop | 5.15.0-1012.16 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-ibm | 5.15.0-1022.25 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-intel-iot-realtime | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-intel-iotg | 5.15.0-1023.28 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-kvm | 5.15.0-1025.30 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency | 5.15.0-57.63 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia | 5.15.0-1015.15 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-5.17 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.0 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.1 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oracle | 5.15.0-1026.32 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-raspi | 5.15.0-1022.24 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-raspi-realtime | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-realtime | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-starfive-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-starfive-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48644 |
Affected products (as reported)
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 9c66d15646760eb8982242b4531c4d4fd36118fd – before d12a1eb07003e597077329767c6aa86a7e972c769c66d15646760eb8982242b4531c4d4fd36118fd – before 586def6ebed195f3594a4884f7c5334d0e1ad1bb9c66d15646760eb8982242b4531c4d4fd36118fd – before f58e43184226e5e9662088ccf1389e424a3a4cbd9c66d15646760eb8982242b4531c4d4fd36118fd – before c7c9c7eb305ab8b4e93e4e4e1b78d8cfcbc263239c66d15646760eb8982242b4531c4d4fd36118fd – before db46e3a88a09c5cf7e505664d01da7238cd56c92 |
| Linux | Linux | 5.4 |
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d12a1eb07003e597077329767c6aa86a7e972c76
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/586def6ebed195f3594a4884f7c5334d0e1ad1bb
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f58e43184226e5e9662088ccf1389e424a3a4cbd
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c7c9c7eb305ab8b4e93e4e4e1b78d8cfcbc26323
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/db46e3a88a09c5cf7e505664d01da7238cd56c92