Octopus Deploy Octopus Server

• CVE-2026-118426 Medium 5.3 In affected versions of Octopus Server with the LDAP authentication provider enabled, any authenticated user could call the LDAP user search and LDAP group search. 0.3%
• CVE-2026-12887 Medium 5.1 In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user with permission to upload a malicious nuget package is able to deploy a script step so the script executes outside of the parent directory. 0.3%
• CVE-2026-117466 High 8.6 In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user holding the System Manager role could escalate their privileges to full system Administrator. 0.2%
• CVE-2026-117341 High 7.7 In affected versions of Octopus Server, creating a user invitation writes the invitation code to the audit event log. When the invitation is linked to a space, a user in that space with appropriate pe 0.2%
• CVE-2026-116870 High 8.7 In affected versions of Octopus Server, OIDC token issuer validation was performed inconsistently. This could result in a token issued from a suitably configured non legitimate issuer being accepted a 0.2%
• CVE-2026-102488 High 8.7 In affected versions, Octopus Server incorrectly evaluates multiple scoped permission assignments, allowing a highly privileged user to obtain deployment permissions beyond those actually granted to t 0.2%
• CVE-2026-102478 High 8.7 In affected versions of Octopus Server, an authenticated user with permission to modify roles could bypass the protections preventing access abuse resulting in privilege escalation. It was possible fo 0.3%
• CVE-2026-78210 High 7.1 In affected versions of Octopus Server, users with certain scoped permission sets could execute arbitrary scripts in an environment without possessing the required authorization. 0.3%
• CVE-2026-101169 High 8.7 In affected versions of Octopus Server, an authenticated user with permissions to edit an Environment or Project can set specifically crafted JSON content for the object. Insecure deserialization of t 0.3%
• CVE-2026-92355 High 8.7 In affected versions of Octopus Server, a user with permission to modify non built-in external feeds could exploit a path traversal flaw to overwrite arbitrary files on the server, which in some confi 0.7%
• CVE-2026-91778 High 7.2 In affected versions of Octopus Server, users with certain scoped permission sets could execute arbitrary scripts on a worker (including the Octopus Server built-in worker). Incorrect permission valid 0.4%
• CVE-2026-14163 High 7.1 In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the deployment variable snapshot in clear-text. 0.4%
• CVE-2026-12702 Medium 5.1 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy Insufficient checks on the project trigger actions allows an unauthorized user to trigger a deployment. 0.3%
• CVE-2026-8296 Medium 5.6 In affected versions of Octopus Server with certain access levels it was possible to embed a Cross-Site Scripting Payload via artifacts. 0.3%
• CVE-2026-4881 Medium 6.0 In affected versions of Octopus Server, permissions were not checked correctly resulting in any authenticated user being able to make server level changes using a certain API endpoint despite receivin 0.2%
• CVE-2026-3237 Low 2.3 In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a low privileged user to manipulate an API request to change the signing key expiration and revocation time frames via an API endpoint that h 0.2%
• CVE-2026-3236 Low 2.3 In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible to create a new API key from an existing access token resulting in the new API key having a lifetime exceeding the original API key used to mint 0.2%
• CVE-2026-0704 Medium 5.9 In affected version of Octopus Deploy it was possible to remove files and/or contents of files on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentially result in ways to 0.4%
• CVE-2025-0539 Medium 5.9 In affected Microsoft Windows versions of Octopus Deploy, the server can be coerced into sending server-side requests that contain authentication material allowing a suitably positioned attacker to co 0.4%
• CVE-2025-0588 Medium 5.9 In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a user with sufficient access to set custom headers in all server responses. By submitting a specifically crafted referrer header the user co 0.4%
• CVE-2025-0513 Low 1.8 In affected versions of Octopus Server error messages were handled unsafely on the error page. If an adversary could control any part of the error message they could embed code which may impact the us 0.2%
• CVE-2025-0526 Low 2.3 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it was possible to upload files to unexpected locations on the host using an API endpoint. The field lacked validation which could potentially result in ways to 0.4%
• CVE-2025-0525 Low 2.3 In affected versions of Octopus Server the preview import feature could be leveraged to identify the existence of a target file. This could provide an adversary with information that may aid in furthe 0.4%
• CVE-2025-0589 Medium 6.9 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy where customers are using Active Directory for authentication it was possible for an unauthenticated user to make an API request against two endpoints which woul 0.4%
• CVE-2024-1656 Low 2.6 Affected versions of Octopus Server had a weak content security policy. 0.2%
• CVE-2024-7998 Low 2.6 In affected versions of Octopus Server OIDC cookies were using the wrong expiration time which could result in them using the maximum lifespan. 0.2%
• CVE-2024-6972 Medium 6.5 In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain circumstances it is possible for sensitive variables to be printed in the task log in clear-text. 0.2%
• CVE-2024-4811 Low 2.2 In affected versions of Octopus Server under certain conditions, a user with specific role assignments can access restricted project artifacts. 0.2%
• CVE-2024-4456 Medium 4.1 In affected versions of Octopus Server with certain access levels it was possible to embed a Cross-Site Scripting payload on the audit page. 0.3%
• CVE-2024-4226 Low 3.5 It was identified that in certain versions of Octopus Server, that a user created with no permissions could view all users, user roles and permissions. This functionality was removed in versions of Oc 0.3%
• CVE-2023-4509 Medium 4.3 It is possible for an API key to be logged in clear text in the audit log file after an invalid login attempt. 0.2%
• CVE-2024-2975 High 8.8 A race condition was identified through which privilege escalation was possible in certain configurations. 0.4%
• CVE-2023-1904 Medium 4.2 In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for the OpenID client secret to be logged in clear text during the configuration of Octopus Server. 0.4%
• CVE-2022-2416 Medium 5.5 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to craft a request that allows enumeration/recon of an environment. 0.3%
• CVE-2022-2346 Medium 5.5 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a low privileged guest user to interact with extension endpoints. 0.3%
• CVE-2022-4870 Medium 5.3 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to discover network details via error message 0.4%
• CVE-2023-2247 Unrated In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to unmask variable secrets using the variable preview function 0.4%
• CVE-2022-2507 Medium 5.3 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to render user supplied input into the webpage 0.4%
• CVE-2022-4009 High 8.8 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to introduce code via offline package creation 0.7%
• CVE-2022-2259 Medium 4.3 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Workerpools without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items 0.4%
• CVE-2022-2258 Medium 4.3 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for a user to view Tagsets without being explicitly assigned permissions to view these items 0.5%
• CVE-2022-2883 High 7.5 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible to upload a zipbomb file as a task which results in Denial of Service 1.0%
• CVE-2022-4898 Medium 5.4 In affected versions of Octopus Server the help sidebar can be customized to include a Cross-Site Scripting payload in the support link. This was initially resolved in advisory 2022-07 however it was 0.4%
• CVE-2022-3614 Medium 6.1 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy users of certain browsers using AD to sign-in to Octopus Server were able to bypass authentication checks and be redirected to the configured redirect url withou 0.4%
• CVE-2022-3460 High 7.5 In affected versions of Octopus Deploy it is possible for certain types of sensitive variables to inadvertently become unmasked when viewed in variable preview. 0.6%
• CVE-2022-2721 High 7.5 In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for target discovery to print certain values marked as sensitive to log files in plaint-text in when verbose logging is enabled. 0.6%
• CVE-2022-2572 Critical 9.8 In affected versions of Octopus Server where access is managed by an external authentication provider, it was possible that the API key/keys of a disabled/deleted user were still valid after the acces 1.0%
• CVE-2022-2508 Medium 5.3 In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to reveal the existence of resources in a space that the user does not have access to due to verbose error messaging. 0.6%
• CVE-2022-2782 Critical 9.1 In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible for a session token to be valid indefinitely due to improper validation of the session token parameters. 0.7%
• CVE-2022-2780 High 8.1 In affected versions of Octopus Server it is possible to use the Git Connectivity test function on the VCS project to initiate an SMB request resulting in the potential for an NTLM relay attack. 0.6%