Vulnerability · Published Sep 11, 2024 · Assigned by Linux
CVE-2024-45025fix bitmap corruption on close_range() with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE
Medium 5.5
In plain English
A medium-severity security flaw in Linux from Linux. There are no confirmed reports of exploitation so far. The chance it is exploited in the next 30 days is estimated at 0.2% (higher than 15% of all known vulnerabilities). Fixed versions are available - upgrade the affected package.
Official description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fix bitmap corruption on close_range() with CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE copy_fd_bitmaps(new, old, count) is expected to copy the first count/BITS_PER_LONG bits from old->full_fds_bits[] and fill the rest with zeroes. What it does is copying enough words (BITS_TO_LONGS(count/BITS_PER_LONG)), then memsets the rest. That works fine, *if* all bits past the cutoff point are clear. Otherwise we are risking garbage from the last word we'd copied. For most of the callers that is true - expand_fdtable() has count equal to old->max_fds, so there's no open descriptors past count, let alone fully occupied words in ->open_fds[], which is what bits in ->full_fds_bits[] correspond to. The other caller (dup_fd()) passes sane_fdtable_size(old_fdt, max_fds), which is the smallest multiple of BITS_PER_LONG that covers all opened descriptors below max_fds. In the common case (copying on fork()) max_fds is ~0U, so all opened descriptors will be below it and we are fine, by the same reasons why the call in expand_fdtable() is safe. Unfortunately, there is a case where max_fds is less than that and where we might, indeed, end up with junk in ->full_fds_bits[] - close_range(from, to, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) with * descriptor table being currently shared * 'to' being above the current capacity of descriptor table * 'from' being just under some chunk of opened descriptors. In that case we end up with observably wrong behaviour - e.g. spawn a child with CLONE_FILES, get all descriptors in range 0..127 open, then close_range(64, ~0U, CLOSE_RANGE_UNSHARE) and watch dup(0) ending up with descriptor #128, despite #64 being observably not open. The minimally invasive fix would be to deal with that in dup_fd(). If this proves to add measurable overhead, we can go that way, but let's try to fix copy_fd_bitmaps() first. * new helper: bitmap_copy_and_expand(to, from, bits_to_copy, size). * make copy_fd_bitmaps() take the bitmap size in words, rather than bits; it's 'count' argument is always a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG, so we are not losing any information, and that way we can use the same helper for all three bitmaps - compiler will see that count is a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG for the large ones, so it'll generate plain memcpy()+memset(). Reproducer added to tools/testing/selftests/core/close_range_test.c
Affected packages & fixed versions
| Ecosystem | Package | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | 6.1.112-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Debian:12 | linux | 6.1.112-1 | DSA-5782-1 |
| Debian:13 | linux | 6.10.7-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Debian:14 | linux | 6.10.7-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux | 5.15.0-125.135 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux | 6.8.0-50.51 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-allwinner-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws | 5.15.0-1072.78 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-aws | 6.8.0-1020.22 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-6.8 | 6.8.0-1020.22~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure | 5.15.0-1075.84 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-azure | 6.8.0-1020.23 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-6.8 | 6.8.0-1020.23~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde | 5.15.0-1076.85.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp | 5.15.0-1071.79 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-gcp | 6.8.0-1019.21 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-6.8 | 6.8.0-1019.21~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gke | 5.15.0-1069.75 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-gke | 6.8.0-1015.19 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gkeop | 5.15.0-1055.62 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-gkeop | 6.8.0-1002.4 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-6.8 | 6.8.0-50.51~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-ibm | 5.15.0-1065.68 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-ibm | 6.8.0-1017.17 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-ibm-6.8 | 6.8.0-1017.17~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-intel-iotg | 5.15.0-1067.73 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-kvm | 5.15.0-1069.74 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency | 5.15.0-125.135 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency | 6.8.0-50.51.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.8 | 6.8.0-50.51.1~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia | 5.15.0-1067.68 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-nvidia | 6.8.0-1019.21 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia-6.8 | 6.8.0-1019.21~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-nvidia-lowlatency | 6.8.0-1019.21.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia-tegra | 5.15.0-1032.32 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia-tegra-igx | 5.15.0-1020.20 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-5.17 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.0 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.1 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.8 | 6.8.0-1018.18 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oracle | 5.15.0-1070.76 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-oracle | 6.8.0-1017.18 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oracle-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oracle-6.8 | 6.8.0-1017.18~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-raspi | 5.15.0-1065.68 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-raspi | 6.8.0-1016.18 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-realtime | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-riscv | 6.8.0-50.51.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv-6.8 | 6.8.0-50.51.1~22.04.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-starfive-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-starfive-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-starfive-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-xilinx | 6.8.0-1017.18 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-xilinx-zynqmp | 5.15.0-1038.42 | UBUNTU-CVE-2024-45025 |
Affected products (as reported)
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 278a5fbaed89dacd04e9d052f4594ffd0e0585de – before fe5bf14881701119aeeda7cf685f3c226c7380df278a5fbaed89dacd04e9d052f4594ffd0e0585de – before 5053581fe5dfb09b58c65dd8462bf5dea71f41ff278a5fbaed89dacd04e9d052f4594ffd0e0585de – before 8cad3b2b3ab81ca55f37405ffd1315bcc2948058278a5fbaed89dacd04e9d052f4594ffd0e0585de – before dd72ae8b0fce9c0bbe9582b9b50820f0407f8d8a278a5fbaed89dacd04e9d052f4594ffd0e0585de – before c69d18f0ac7060de724511537810f10f29a27958278a5fbaed89dacd04e9d052f4594ffd0e0585de – before 9a2fa1472083580b6c66bdaf291f591e1170123a |
| Linux | Linux | 5.9 |
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fe5bf14881701119aeeda7cf685f3c226c7380df
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5053581fe5dfb09b58c65dd8462bf5dea71f41ff
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8cad3b2b3ab81ca55f37405ffd1315bcc2948058
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dd72ae8b0fce9c0bbe9582b9b50820f0407f8d8a
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c69d18f0ac7060de724511537810f10f29a27958
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9a2fa1472083580b6c66bdaf291f591e1170123a
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00001.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2024/10/msg00003.html