Vulnerability · Published Aug 21, 2024 · Assigned by Linux
CVE-2022-48892sched/core: Fix use-after-free bug in dup_user_cpus_ptr()
High 7.8
In plain English
A high-severity security flaw in Linux from Linux. There are no confirmed reports of exploitation so far. The chance it is exploited in the next 30 days is estimated at 0.2% (higher than 16% of all known vulnerabilities). Fixed versions are available - upgrade the affected package.
Official description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/core: Fix use-after-free bug in dup_user_cpus_ptr() Since commit 07ec77a1d4e8 ("sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems"), the setting and clearing of user_cpus_ptr are done under pi_lock for arm64 architecture. However, dup_user_cpus_ptr() accesses user_cpus_ptr without any lock protection. Since sched_setaffinity() can be invoked from another process, the process being modified may be undergoing fork() at the same time. When racing with the clearing of user_cpus_ptr in __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked(), it can lead to user-after-free and possibly double-free in arm64 kernel. Commit 8f9ea86fdf99 ("sched: Always preserve the user requested cpumask") fixes this problem as user_cpus_ptr, once set, will never be cleared in a task's lifetime. However, this bug was re-introduced in commit 851a723e45d1 ("sched: Always clear user_cpus_ptr in do_set_cpus_allowed()") which allows the clearing of user_cpus_ptr in do_set_cpus_allowed(). This time, it will affect all arches. Fix this bug by always clearing the user_cpus_ptr of the newly cloned/forked task before the copying process starts and check the user_cpus_ptr state of the source task under pi_lock. Note to stable, this patch won't be applicable to stable releases. Just copy the new dup_user_cpus_ptr() function over.
Affected packages & fixed versions
| Ecosystem | Package | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | linux | 6.1.7-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Debian:13 | linux | 6.1.7-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Debian:14 | linux | 6.1.7-1 | DEBIAN-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux | 5.15.0-70.77 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-allwinner-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws | 5.15.0-1034.38 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-aws-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure | 5.15.0-1036.43 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde | 5.15.0-1036.43.1 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-azure-fde-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp | 5.15.0-1032.40 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gcp-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gke | 5.15.0-1031.36 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-gkeop | 5.15.0-1018.23 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-hwe-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-ibm | 5.15.0-1028.31 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-intel-iotg | 5.15.0-1028.33 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-kvm | 5.15.0-1031.36 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency | 5.15.0-70.77 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-lowlatency-hwe-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia | 5.15.0-1023.23 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-nvidia-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-5.17 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.0 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.1 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oem-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oracle | 5.15.0-1033.39 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-oracle-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-raspi | 5.15.0-1027.29 | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:24.04:LTS | linux-raspi-realtime | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-realtime | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-riscv-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-starfive-5.19 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-starfive-6.2 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
| Ubuntu:22.04:LTS | linux-starfive-6.5 | no fix listed | UBUNTU-CVE-2022-48892 |
Affected products (as reported)
| Vendor | Product | Versions |
|---|---|---|
| Linux | Linux | 07ec77a1d4e82526e1588979fff2f024f8e96df2 – before b22faa21b6230d5eccd233e1b7e0026a5002b28707ec77a1d4e82526e1588979fff2f024f8e96df2 – before 7b5cc7fd1789ea5dbb942c9f8207b076d365badc07ec77a1d4e82526e1588979fff2f024f8e96df2 – before 87ca4f9efbd7cc649ff43b87970888f2812945b8 |
| Linux | Linux | 5.15 |